| |
Emma 102 Course Development
Internet Search Engines and Academic Research: Using
Advanced Search Features to Achieve Better Results
An Information Literacy Course presented by the Emma
Goldman Memorial Library Reference Services
Melanie Chu, Frances Howard, Bill Sherwood & Geoffrey
Skinner
LIBR228-1 Assign. 3
May 12, 2002
Setting
The setting is a small academic
college library, the Emma Goldman Memorial Library. We will
hold the instructional session in a classroom with desks, a
computer, and a projector.
The audience will be beginning college students. These
students have used the Web, including search engines to
gather information for limited academic purposes, as well
as recreational or informational needs. They are familiar
with search engines; however, they have typically used only
the simplest search functions, generally the default
keyword search option. They may not know that advanced
features, such as Boolean operators or phrase searching,
can be used to refine searches for better results. This
course is designed to teach undergraduates to use the
advanced search features of Internet search engines and
other electronic resources, including the library's
databases, to achieve better results in their academic
research. Ultimately, the purpose of this instruction is to
help students develop the skills, adaptability, and
confidence to find and use information in an academic
environment. Goals
Our goal is for the first year
undergraduate students to have a clear understanding of how
to effectively use an Internet search engine for basic
academic research. Maughan (2001) says that Patricia Senn
Brevik and E. Gordon Gee, "emphasized the critical
importance of partnerships [between faculty and librarians]
within colleges and universities in graduating students
qualified to be called information literate." Bibliographic
instruction is important and deserves thoughtful
preparation.
With that in mind, we discussed several techniques to
convey search methods to the undergraduate students.
Starkey (1987) says, "The most important result of a good
lecture is that a listener is left with the memory that an
intelligent, professional person, completely in command of
his or her material, presented a well organized body of
difficult but nevertheless intelligible material." Even
though this is our goal, we must keep in mind that we will
not reach all of the students, possibly because of
different learning styles. Starkey (1987) also notes that,
"On the average, [of] students who attend library lectures
(or any other lecture, for that matter)… at best
approximately ten percent will remember and internalize
every main point." To allow for this tendency, we will
utilize visual aids in class, distribute handouts with the
main points summarized, and employ problem based learning
to engage with the students while teaching them valuable
skills. Such problem-based learning includes different
ideas from other sources in relation to problem resolution.
Students must also learn how to use information in making
decisions and/or solving problems. We aim to create an
environment that motivates our students to be life-long
learners.
Following a half-hour instructional session focused on
research students' real-life research questions with an
Internet search engine, students will gain understanding in
areas including advanced search features such as Boolean
and phrase searching, the theoretical concepts behind
Boolean operators, and basic styles of citing online
resources. As Ackermann and Hartman (2000) say, "None of
the search engines are exactly alike. Some are better for
certain kinds of information than others." Therefore, it is
beneficial that the advanced search techniques we are
demonstrating in Google can be applied to other tools.
The skills gained in this course will enable students to
effectively use advanced search techniques of Boolean and
phrase searching, and with this theoretical knowledge of
Boolean searching, they will be able to apply those
advanced search techniques to the library OPAC and other
electronic resources. They will also be able to locate
guidelines for appropriate formats (APA, MLA,
Chicago/Turabian) for citing online resources.
The criterion for the students will be that within
thirty minutes, students can successfully conduct the
following simple Boolean searches: and, or, and not. They
will also learn how to implement phrase searches and locate
guidelines for appropriate formats (APA, MLA,
Chicago/Turabian) for citing online resources.
Limitations
One limitation of the program is that
only a few of Google's advanced features will be covered.
To fully explore all of Google's advanced search features
would take far longer than the allotted time. We will also
lack time to discuss evaluating the quality of the results,
which is admittedly a critical topic when doing research.
Fortunately, this session is only the first of two modules.
The second module covers evaluating resources; a third
course offered by the library goes into greater depth about
citing resources using the appropriate citation
formats.
Course Development
The process of our group project
included meeting three to four times in person in which we
split up reading and research work for the literature
review. We discussed at length several potential topics. In
our discussions, we changed the topic and the title of our
project several times until we came to our present one.
There was a lot of discussion about format and structure.
The academic group also did a lot of rewriting and
reorganization of materials before we came to the final
product. We also communicated by Blackboard, email, and
telephone. We discussed several teaching methods, reviewed
and discussed various examples of bibliographic methods.
Our academic group also looked at several examples of
instructional media, which included, PowerPoint
presentations, web sites, handouts, and other instructional
resources in which we accessed and used to support our
project.
Projected Impact of Services
We are basing this course on the assumption that the more
we teach the students about the search process, the more
sophisticated library users they will become. This will
effectively challenge the reference librarians to provide
more in-depth service. Librarians will also not be burdened
by time consuming basic questions, but will get more
high-level questions. <<h3>Benefits to User
Community
This course and its companion modules
benefit both students and faculty. Faculty will able to
expect more thorough research on assigned papers.
The primary benefit to students will be more efficient
and focused search strategies with less wasted time in
evaluating an overwhelming number of useless search
results. They will be able to analyze their search needs by
making more informed choices in how to implement the search
query. By developing better search strategies, students
will gain confidence in their research abilities. If the
students take the second module, they will be able to
better evaluate the resources they discover. The skills
they learn in such courses can prepare them for their
futures in academia and beyond.
References
- Ackermann, E., & K. Hartman. (2000). Internet
& web essentials: what you need to know. Oregon:
Franklin, Beedle & Associates, Inc.
- Bibliographic instruction resources on the Internet
(The Teaching Library). (2000). Retrieved May 9, 2002,
from
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/BIResources.html.
- Boening, C.H., & D. Grimes. (2001). "Worries with
the web: a look at student use of Web resources." College
and Research Libraries (62)(1), 11-23.
- Information Literacy Bibliography and Links. (2000).
Information literacy - Lacuny Institute. Retrieved May 8,
2002, from
http://lacuny.cuny.edu/institute/links.html.
- Information Literacy (Saint Peter's College
Libraries). (2000). Retrieved May 9, 2002, from,
http://www.spc.edu/library/infolit.html.
- Library instruction links (29th Workshop on
instruction in library use): (2000). Retrieved May 8,
2002, from
http://www.lib.uwo.ca/wilu2000/links.html.
- McCarthy, G., (1994). "Getting to know your
non-users." Library Management (15), (4), 30-34.
- Maughan, P.D., (2001). "Assessing information
literacy among undergraduates: a discussion of the
literature and the University of California-Berkeley
Assessment experience." College and Research Libraries
(62)(1), 71-85.
- Oppenheim, C., (1996). "An agenda for action to
achieve the information society In the UK." Journal of
Information Science (22) (6), 407-421.
- Starkey, E. D. (1987). "Reexamining the library
lecture." In Defining and applying effective teaching
strategies for library instruction; library orientation
series.Library instruction conference (14th : 1987). Ed.
Bunge, Mary B.University Libraries, Indiana
University-Purdue University at Indianapolis.
|